A proposed 24.99% council tax increase?

by | Jan 14, 2025 | 0 comments

RBWM has asked the Government (MHCLG) to allow a council tax rise of 24.99% – an additional 20% above the usual cap. This is unprecedented, and I believe itโ€™s unlikely to be approved because the government have said they do not want to increase tax for working people.

I am told that the council hope to find out in mid to late February. It will be discussed at RBWM Cabinet meeting on 26th February and at the full council meeting on 5th March.

Many of you have been asking me what this means for the residents of RBWM as we are being told that if this rise is not agreed we will be facing a section 114 notice (bankruptcy – see below). This is my considered opinion, gathering together all the facts that I know to date and from speaking to a councillor from a different authority who are currently in S114.

๐Ÿ“ข
๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ช๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—œ๐—ณ ๐—ฅ๐—•๐—ช๐—  ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฐ ๐—ก๐—ผ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ?
A Section 114 (S114) notice is issued when a council can no longer balance its budget, forcing drastic action to recover. Itโ€™s not bankruptcy, but it does mean significant changes. Hereโ€™s what it would mean for RBWM and our community:

๐Ÿ’ฐ
๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—™๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—–๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜€
Issued by the councilโ€™s Chief Finance Officer, a S114 notice is a formal statement that the council cannot meet its legal obligation to balance its budget.

๐Ÿšจ
๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—™๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐˜‡๐—ฒ
Non-essential spending stops immediately. Only essential or legally required services will continue.

๐Ÿ›๏ธ
๐—ก๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ธ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ฐ๐˜†
A S114 notice isnโ€™t like corporate bankruptcy. Councils donโ€™t close or dissolve, but must take urgent steps to fix their finances.

๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš–๏ธ
๐—š๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ข๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜
In severe cases, Government-appointed commissioners may oversee council operations to ensure a recovery plan is implemented.

๐Ÿ’ท
๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€
A S114 notice doesnโ€™t erase debt. The council must still repay what it owes – often by selling assets (buildings and land etc), cutting services, or increasing taxes.
๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฅ๐—•๐—ช๐— ?
All or some of the following could happen:

๐Ÿ”ด
๐—–๐˜‚๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€
Vital but non-statutory services like libraries, street cleaning, and community projects could be scaled back or cut entirely.
๐Ÿ”ด ๐—ก๐—ผ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด
All capital projects would be paused unless funded by external sources or asset sales.
๐Ÿ”ด ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐—ณ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€
Resources are likely to be scaled back or cut as part of any recovery plan.
๐Ÿ”ด ๐——๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐˜€
Expect more developments in the borough to increase council tax revenue and developer contributions.
๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜€โ€™ ๐—ฅ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฒ
๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€โš–๏ธ ๐—ช๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜‚๐—ฒ ๐—ช๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด
Even under S114, councillors continue to meet, vote, and represent you. The focus shifts to working within tighter constraints to recover the councilโ€™s finances while protecting essential services as much as possible.
๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—น ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜
๐Ÿ“‹ ๐—ข๐—ป๐—น๐˜† ๐—ข๐—ป๐—ฒ-๐—ฌ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป
The council has only submitted a one year plan due to the government looking to reform local government from 26/27. I assume this is a short term solution to help RBWM until then.

๐Ÿ”Ž
๐—”๐—น๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€?
If the 24.99% increase is rejected (as I expect), the only options would be:
1๏ธโƒฃ Issuing a S114 notice.
2๏ธโƒฃ Borrowing more money – I am unsure if RBWM has the assets to secure this beyond the ยฃ60m already being requested.
3๏ธโƒฃ The Government might impose a multi-year settlement due to them saying they will be more flexible with options for struggling councils such as RBWM.
๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐——๐—ผ ๐—ช๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ?
Itโ€™s important to understand how we got into this situation, but now the council need to focus on solutions instead of a political blame game, and leave it to a forensic accounting investigation to figure out how we got here.
This isnโ€™t about politics – itโ€™s about doing whatโ€™s right for our community. Iโ€™m here to listen, represent you, and work towards practical solutions that will help us move forward together. ๐Ÿ’ฌ
I will continue to put people before politics and always putting the borough first #PeopleBeforePolitics #TBFI